Australia has a list of baby names you are not allowed to use, a church once decided a devil statue was simply too attractive for public viewing, and one German bloke accidentally kayaked his way from Europe to Australia... 

This week, we rollercoaster our way between naming laws, sexy satanic art, and a seven year kayaking epic that sounds made up, but trust us, it was very real.

BABY NAMES THE Government Says no too

We start with names, because nothing says “welcome to society” like Government paperwork. It turns out a lot of countries, including Australia, have rules about what you can call your child, and some names are straight up banned. The reasons are usually the same. The name could cause harm, invite ridicule, imply a title, or create a lifelong admin nightmare.

So yes, names like Prince, Princess, and Lucifer can end up on the no list depending on where you live. Which is both funny and slightly confronting. On one hand, it feels like common sense. On the other hand, it is hard to come to terms with. Sadly, there will be no other wizard like Harry Potter.

When a Devil Statue Is Too Hot for Church

Then we head into the world of art, where the Geefs brothers carved a devil statue for a church and accidentally made him too attractive. Like, distractingly attractive. The kind of handsome that apparently had parishioners thinking less about salvation and more about cheekbones.

So the church did what any sensible institution would do when confronted with a sexy satanic sculpture. It panicked and removed it. Which is hilarious, but also a reminder that art has always had the power to unsettle people, sometimes for deep reasons, and sometimes because the devil looks like he belongs on the cover of a romance novel.

This is where Stendhal syndrome comes in too, the idea that beauty can overwhelm you so much you feel dizzy, emotional, even physically unwell. Whether it is a neat diagnosis or a dramatic way of saying “I got a bit faint in Florence”, it is still a great concept. 

Hackable AI

AI is pretty gullible. It’s easy to flatter and even easier to trick. Researchers tested how little it takes to steer an AI agent away from “truth” and towards whatever someone wants it to recommend, and the answer is depressing but also rather funny. 

An 11 to 15 word snippet can be enough to hijack the result, especially when the question is specific and the AI is leaning on sources like Reddit or Wikipedia. It does not stop to ask, “Is this someone gaming me?” It just nods politely and then repeats itself.

So yes, SEO is evolving. Now it’s AI optimisation. And if you’ve ever felt even slightly uneasy about letting AI make decisions for you, this is your reminder to keep your brain switched on. Is it artificial? Yes. Is it intelligent? Absolutely not.

The MAGIC Onion Gene?

Nutrition research is a circus at the best of times. People forget what they ate, lie about what they ate, change what they eat, and then we all just pretend the data is clean. So researchers are always hunting for something more solid than self reports. Something closer to an objective signal.

Scientists looked at whether genes that are linked to taste and smell can act as proxies for food preferences. They ran the numbers across a huge dataset and found a lot of associations, but one stood out amongst the rest as rather bizarre and surprisingly strong. 

Onions.

There’s a specific variant of a smell receptor gene that seems to line up with people who genuinely like the smell and taste of onions. And those same people also show lower odds of type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure. No, it does not prove onions are a magic health hack. But it does give researchers a cleaner thread to pull on, and it raises the kind of question that makes you stare at your cutting board like it’s doing something behind your back.

Also, if we can find an onion preference in your genes, we should absolutely be allowed to find the gene responsible for putting olive oil and salt on vanilla ice cream and calling it “delicious”.

Oskar Speck and the Kayak Trip That Escalated Wildly

Finally, we get to Oskar Speck, who set out from Germany during a collapsing economy and somehow ended up in Australia by kayak. Not as a stunt. Not as a sponsored endurance challenge. Just a man trying to outrun a bad situation, one paddle stroke at a time, and then realising he had committed to something enormous.

The journey took seven years and included malaria, dangerous crossings, prison camps during World War II, and the general problem of turning up in remote places in a kayak and trying to explain yourself. 

It is one of those stories that makes modern travel feel easy. Miss a flight today and you get a voucher. Miss a safe landing in 1930s island waters and you might not get a tomorrow.

So that is the week. Governments policing baby names, churches getting flustered by hot devils, and a kayaking odyssey that makes your weekend plans look laughably small. Stay curious, stay sceptical, and if you are naming a child, maybe check the banned list before you commit to Lucifer James.

 

CHAPTERS:

00:00 Banned Baby Names Setup

00:33 Germany Name Ban Game

01:50 Lucifer And Other Forbiddens

04:13 New Zealand Weird Bans

05:52 US Rules And Santa Claus

06:58 Australia Banned Names List

09:43 Name Roast Side Hustle

10:34 Hot Art Hospitalization

14:17 Stendhal Syndrome Explained

18:26 Hacking AI Agents

20:41 Prompt Hacking Agents

22:59 Ethical AI Sabotage

23:20 Nutrition Study Pitfalls

24:25 Genes As Diet Proxies

27:40 Onion Gene Surprise

30:22 Ice Cream Taste Debate

30:59 Button Sewing Fails

32:03 Kayaking To Australia

39:54 Just Do Stuff Mindset

41:30 Wrap Up

 
Next
Next